The Chukim of Your Will: Chanukah's Answer to Greece
We say that the Greeks rose “to make them forget Your Torah and to make them stray from the chukim of Your will.” If they meant to uproot the whole Torah, why single out the chukim? And why do we light on the first night, when no miracle happened that day?
And the earth was formless and void, and darkness was upon the face of the deep, and the spirit of God hovered over the face of the waters.
1The Midrash says: “‘And darkness was upon the face of the deep’: this is the kingdom of Greece, which darkened the eyes of Israel with its decrees. It would say to them, ‘Write on the horn of the ox that you have no portion in the God of Israel.’”1
Bereishis Rabbah 2:4 (the sefer has 2:5); Bereishis 1:2. ↩
In shortThe Midrash calls Greece “darkness”: it ordered Israel to write on an ox's horn that it had no portion in the God of Israel.
2What does “darkness” mean here, that Chazal chose it to describe how terrible the evil of the Greek kingdom was? We must also ask why the Greeks told Israel to write this on the horn of an ox, of all places. And notice the wording “you have no portion”: what was that portion which they came to say Israel did not have?
Beis Yosef, Orach Chaim 670. The cruse held enough oil for one day, so only the seven days after it were miraculous. ↩
In shortIf the oil was enough for the first day, why do we light for eight days rather than seven?
4Before we explain, let us look at what we say in the Al HaNissim prayer: the Greeks rose up “to make them forget Your Torah and to make them stray from the chukim of Your will.” This is hard to understand. First we say that they rose against Israel “to make them forget Your Torah,” which implies the whole Torah. Then we say “to make them stray from the chukim of Your will,” which implies that the Greeks turned Israel away only from the chukim, the decrees that have no reason, and not from the whole Torah.
In shortAl HaNissim speaks of making Israel forget the whole Torah, yet also of turning it away only from the chukim.
5We can explain this as follows. As we know, the Torah has two kinds of mitzvos: rational mitzvos, which the mind can understand, and chukim. Yet a person must reach the level where even when he does one of the rational mitzvos, he does it only for the honor of Hashem's Name, bending all the thoughts of his heart and mind to Him. He should not do it because of any reasons or understanding of his own, but as though it were a chok.
In shortEven a rational mitzvah should be kept only for Hashem's honor, as though it were a chok.
6The holy sefarim explain why.3 If a person does the mitzvos only out of his own understanding, then he finds them right to do only because he understands their reasons. This proves that he is serving not the Creator but himself. Rather, we must keep the mitzvos simply and wholeheartedly, because Hashem commanded us, and not because our minds agree. What is more, a person who keeps the mitzvos because of his own reasoning may, Heaven forbid, stray from the King's highway. We find this with Shlomo HaMelech.4 The verse says, “He shall not take many wives for himself,”5 and Shlomo said, “I will take many, and I will not turn aside.” Yet it is written, “And it was at the time of Shlomo's old age …”6 So it is good and right to keep the mitzvos only because the Creator commanded them, and then one will not err or transgress them.
Melachim I 11:4. The verse continues: “… that his wives turned his heart after other gods.” ↩
In shortKeeping mitzvos for our own reasons is serving ourselves and can lead astray, as Shlomo's reasoning about many wives did.
7This power to serve the Creator simply because Hashem commanded it, as a chok, belongs only to Klal Yisrael and not to the nations of the world. Even when the nations keep their seven mitzvos, the laws given to all the descendants of Noach, they keep them only because their minds understand them. So Chazal tell of Dama ben Nesinah, a gentile, that as a reward for honoring his father, the Holy One, blessed be He, caused a red heifer to be born in his herd the following year.7 The holy sefarim explain why his reward was a red heifer, of all things:8 to show the difference between the nations and Klal Yisrael. The nations keep only a rational mitzvah such as honoring one's father, but Israel gives its life and its money even for a mitzvah like the red heifer, which has no reason.
Kiddushin 31a. Dama ben Nesinah of Ashkelon would not wake his sleeping father even for a great profit. ↩
Maharal, Tiferes Yisrael, ch. 41; Ohel Torah (the teachings of R' Menachem Mendel of Kotzk), Chukas. ↩
In shortOnly Israel serves Hashem as a chok; Dama ben Nesinah's reward was a red heifer, the chok for which Israel gives anything.
8With this we can explain the verse “This is the chok of the Torah which Hashem commanded, saying.”9 The well-known difficulty is: why “the chok of the Torah”? The verse should have said “the chok of the red heifer.” According to what we have said, we may say that the verse comes to teach Bnei Yisrael how to keep all the mitzvos of the Torah. When they keep the Torah, the mitzvos must be in their eyes like a chok. They should keep it without any reasoning of their own, only because it is what “Hashem commanded, saying.” That is why it says “the chok of the Torah.”
In short“The chok of the Torah” teaches that the whole Torah, not only the red heifer, is to be kept as a chok.
9This also explains a Midrash on the verse “If you will walk in My statutes, bechukosai”:10 “This is what is written, ‘I considered my ways, and I turned my feet back to Your testimonies.’ Dovid said: Master of the world, every single day I would plan and say, ‘I am going to such-and-such a place, to such-and-such a dwelling,’ and my feet would bring me to the synagogues and the study halls.”11 This means the following. “Such-and-such a place and such-and-such a dwelling” hint at what a person wants for himself. When Dovid HaMelech was doing the mitzvos and his own reasoning and personal interests stirred in him, then “my feet would lead me to the synagogues.”12 He cast aside all his own reasoning and made himself do the mitzvah only because the Creator commanded it. This is how the Midrash connects to “If you will walk in My statutes”: one must keep the mitzvos as a chok, and not because of their reason.
The sefer quotes it here as “lead me”; above, “bring me.” ↩
In shortWhen his own plans stirred, Dovid's feet took him to the study hall; he kept the mitzvos as a chok, “walking in My statutes.”
10The Greeks wanted to root in the Jewish people the way of the nations: keeping only the rational mitzvos and not the chukim. That is why they issued decrees against these three things in particular: Shabbos, Chodesh, the sanctifying of the new month, and circumcision.13 All three are a kind of chok. With circumcision, even after all the inquiries and reasons given for it, the mitzvah remains a chok without a reason. The mitzvah of the new month, counting our months by the moon, is also a kind of chok. And so is Shabbos. Its essence does have a reason, to root in us the recognition of the Creator, for through Shabbos we testify “that in six days Hashem made the heavens and the earth, and on the seventh day He ceased and rested.”14 Yet the thirty-nine melachos, the categories of work forbidden on Shabbos, and the other prohibitions are a kind of chok. Some of them involve no effort at all, and we do not understand why they were forbidden.
In shortTo wean Israel from the chukim, the Greeks banned Shabbos, the new month and circumcision, each of which is a kind of chok.
11With this we can resolve the 's question. True, we cannot understand why the first day was set for lighting. But that itself is the point of the mitzvah: through it we show that we do the Creator's mitzvos without a reason. And this is the heart of Chanukah, doing the opposite of what the Greeks wanted when they tried to uproot from us the keeping of the chukim. When the Chashmona'im, the Hasmoneans, prevailed over the Greeks, they rooted in us the strength to keep the Creator's mitzvos simply and wholeheartedly, even when we have no grasp or understanding of them.
In shortWe light on the first night, which has no miracle to explain it, to show that we keep Hashem's mitzvos without a reason.
12[We can add a further explanation.15 Among the rabbinic mitzvos we do not find any that is a kind of chok. As is well known, the way of the Greeks and the Hellenists, the Jews who took on Greek ways, was to uproot, Heaven forbid, emunas chachamim, faith in the Sages. That is the way of heretics, as the Gemara says: “An apikoros, a heretic, is one who disparages Torah scholars …” These are the people who say, “What use are the Rabbis to us? They have never permitted us the raven, nor forbidden us the dove,”16 and so they deny the benefit of faith in the Sages. So it was especially necessary to strengthen faith in the Sages too. That is why Chazal added a mitzvah of their own that also has no reason: they instituted lighting on the first day as well.]
The sefer's note: An addition from another place. ↩
Sanhedrin 99b–100a. That is, the Rabbis only repeat what is written in the Torah. ↩
In shortAgainst the Greeks' attack on faith in the Sages, Chazal gave us a rabbinic mitzvah with no reason: lighting on the first night.
13[This is also hinted in what Chazal said about the mitzvah of Chanukah in particular: “And where did He command us? From ‘You shall not turn aside’ and from ‘Ask your father.’”17 Here, where the accursed Greeks came to uproot faith in the Sages, Chazal had to strengthen faith in their words all the more.]
Shabbos 23a; Devarim 17:11; 32:7. These verses command us to follow the Sages, and on them rests the blessing “Who commanded us to light the Chanukah lamp.” ↩
In shortChanukah's blessing rests on the verses commanding obedience to the Sages, because the Greeks attacked faith in their words.
14This is the meaning of “to make them forget Your Torah and to make them stray from the chukim of Your will.” The Greeks wanted to root in Israel their own way of keeping the Torah's mitzvos only out of reason, which is “to make them stray from the chukim of Your will.” Through this they schemed to do away with the whole Torah: “to make them forget Your Torah.”
In shortTurning Israel from the chukim was the Greeks' means; making it forget the whole Torah was their goal.
15a[The Greeks wanted to do away with the whole Torah and its mitzvos in Israel.18 But they knew full well that if they openly decreed that the whole Torah be abolished, Bnei Yisrael would give their lives like burnt offerings and peace offerings rather than abandon it. For Bnei Yisrael have been trained, generation after generation, in mesirus nefesh, the readiness to give one's life, to keep the Torah. This is their inheritance from Avraham Avinu. He was the first to give himself over, casting himself into the fiery furnace,19 and by this he handed down to us the power of mesirus nefesh.]
The sefer's note: An addition from another place. ↩
Bereishis Rabbah 38:13 (the sefer has 38:19). In Ur Kasdim Avraham let himself be cast into the fiery furnace rather than worship idols, and he was saved. ↩
In shortAn open decree against the whole Torah would only have met mesirus nefesh, Israel’s inheritance from Avraham, so the Greeks could not attack the Torah head-on.
15b[So the Greeks acted with cunning. At first they tried to plant their false opinions in Israel. One must indeed keep the Torah, they argued, but only the mitzvos a person understands with his mind; those whose reason he does not understand need not be kept, Heaven forbid. This is “to make them stray from the chukim of Your will”: at first they tried to turn Israel away only from the mitzvos that are chukim, which have no reason. But Chazal have taught us how the yetzer hara works: “Today it tells him, ‘Do this,’ and tomorrow it tells him, ‘Do that,’ until it tells him, ‘Go worship idols,’ and he goes and worships.”20 So it was with the Greeks. Their scheme, as things went on, was that Bnei Yisrael would come to abandon the whole Torah of their own accord. And this is “to make them forget Your Torah,” the whole Torah. That is what we say in Al HaNissim: the Greeks set out “to make them forget Your Torah,” all of it, by beginning only “to make them stray from the chukim of Your will,” and through that the whole Torah would be abandoned and forgotten.]
In shortThe Greeks began with the chukim, arguing that only mitzvos the mind understands need be kept, so that step by step, the yetzer hara’s way, Israel would forget the whole Torah.
16[This is the meaning of the words “the chukim of Your will.” It is precisely by keeping the chukim, whose reason we do not know, that we show we keep the mitzvos because of Hashem's will. When the Greeks rose up against Israel to abolish the chukim, they wanted us, Heaven forbid, to keep the mitzvos because our minds understand them, and not because of Hashem's will. So in these days a holy duty rests on us: to strengthen ourselves and to root deep within us the keeping of the mitzvos only because it is the Creator's will.]
In shortKeeping chukim shows we act from Hashem's will, not our own understanding, and these days call us to strengthen exactly that.
17This is what my holy great-grandfather of Biala, zt"l, said in the 21 on the verse “And it will be, because (eikev) you listen to these laws, and keep and do them.”22 He explained: “Eikev hints at a path, a way of walking, as in ‘Go out in the footsteps (ikvei) of the flock.’23 Chazal said these are ‘the steps your fathers walked,’24 meaning the customs and the tradition of the fathers. If Bnei Yisrael keep the eikev, it will bring them to keep and do the whole Torah and its mitzvos.” This fits what we have explained. The customs and tradition of the fathers are a kind of chok without a reason, and on keeping even what has no reason depends the keeping of all the Torah's mitzvos, as we saw in the Greeks' plan to begin with the chukim.
In shortThe Rebbe prays that we learn and keep the Torah simply and wholeheartedly, holding fast to our fathers' customs.
The maamar as a whole
He asks why we light the first night, when the oil sufficed, and why Al HaNissim speaks both of forgetting the whole Torah and of straying only from the chukim. Even rational mitzvos should be kept as chukim, as Hashem's command: keeping them for our own reasons, the holy sefarim explain, is serving ourselves, and it led Shlomo astray. Only Israel serves so, as the sefarim read Dama ben Nesinah’s red heifer. The Greeks banned Shabbos, the new month and circumcision, each a kind of chok, so as to make Israel forget the whole Torah. So we light on the first night, which no miracle explains; an addition: this also strengthened faith in the Sages. The Rebbe's great-grandfather of Biala teaches in the Divrei Binah that keeping our fathers’ customs brings us to keep the whole Torah, and the Rebbe adds that these customs are kept without a reason.
Takeaway
The Greeks did not begin by attacking the whole Torah; they argued that we should keep only what makes sense to us, knowing that this road leads away from everything. Chanukah answers them: we light even on the first night, which no miracle explains, simply because the Sages commanded it. We can bring the same simplicity into every mitzvah and every custom of our fathers, keeping them wholeheartedly because that is Hashem's will.