Zechusamזכותם
Lehavas David · Parshas Masei · Maamar ג

Humility at Sinai: The Cure for Strife

From the Torah ofRav Dovid Matisyohu Rabinowitzהרב דוד מתתיהו בן יחיאל יהושע רבינוביץProfile ›
Bamidbar 33:15
וַיִּסְעוּ מֵרְפִידִם וַיַּחֲנוּ בְּמִדְבַּר סִינָי
They journeyed from Refidim and encamped in the Wilderness of Sinai.
1“They journeyed from Refidim and encamped in the Wilderness of Sinai.”1 We know Chazal's teaching: “What is Refidim? Sherafu yedeihem, they let their hands grow slack from the Torah.”2 The holy sefarim, the Yitav Lev and the Shomer Emunim, have already looked closely at the expression “their hands.”3 Surely engaging in Torah is done only with the mind and the heart?
וַיִּסְעוּ מֵרְפִידִים וַיַּחֲנוּ בְּמִדְבַּר סִינָי (לג, טו). יָדוּעַ מַה שֶׁאָמְרוּ חז״ל (תנחומא בשלח כה) מַהוּ רְפִידִים, שֶׁרָפוּ יְדֵיהֶם מִן הַתּוֹרָה. וּכְבָר דִּקְדְּקוּ בַּסְּפָרִים הַקְּדוֹשִׁים (עיין ייטב לב בשלח, שומר אמונים מבוא השער פ״ה) מַהוּ הַלָּשׁוֹן ׳יְדֵיהֶם׳, וַהֲלֹא עֵסֶק הַתּוֹרָה אֵינוֹ כִּי אִם בַּמּוֹחַ וּבַלֵּב.
  1. Bamidbar 33:15. ↩
  2. Midrash Tanchuma, Beshalach 25. ↩
  3. See Yitav Lev, Beshalach; Shomer Emunim, Mavo HaShaar, ch. 5. ↩
In shortChazal read Refidim as hands grown slack from the Torah; but Torah is learned with mind and heart, so why “hands”?
2Let us first cite some sayings of Chazal: “Yerushalayim was destroyed only because they did not rebuke one another”; “Yerushalayim was destroyed only because small and great were made equal”;4 and “Yerushalayim was destroyed only because they based their judgments on Torah law and did not go beyond the letter of the law.”5 At first glance this is astonishing. We can understand the other sins listed there, such as desecrating Shabbos and neglecting the Shema morning and evening, for they are among the basic foundations of the Torah. But several of the things we cited are not sins under the Torah at all, and in any case they are not among its foundations. How, then, could Yerushalayim have been destroyed because of them?
וְנַקְדִּים דְּהִנֵּה מָצִינוּ בחז״ל (שבת קיט, ב, בבא מציעא ל, ב) לֹא חָרְבָה יְרוּשָׁלַיִם אֶלָּא בִּשְׁבִיל שֶׁלֹּא הוֹכִיחוּ זֶה אֶת זֶה, לֹא חָרְבָה יְרוּשָׁלַיִם אֶלָּא בִּשְׁבִיל שֶׁהוּשְׁוּו קָטָן וְגָדוֹל, לֹא חָרְבָה יְרוּשָׁלַיִם אֶלָּא עַל שֶׁהֶעֱמִידוּ דִּינֵיהֶם עַל דִּין תּוֹרָה וְלֹא עָבְדוּ לִפְנִים מִשּׁוּרַת הַדִּין. וְלִכְאוֹרָה יִפָּלֵא, דְּבִשְׁלָמָא שְׁאָר עֲבֵירוֹת הַמּוּזְכָּרִים שָׁם כְּחִילּוּל שַׁבָּת בִּיטּוּל קְרִיאַת שְׁמַע שַׁחֲרִית וְעַרְבִית וְכַיּוֹצֵא בָּזֶה, הֵם מֵעִיקְּרֵי וִיסוֹדֵי הַתּוֹרָה, אַךְ הַדְּבָרִים הַנִּזְכָּרִים לְעֵיל כַּמָּה מֵהֶם הֵם בִּכְלָל לֹא עָוֹן מִן הַתּוֹרָה, וְעַל כָּל פָּנִים אֵינָם מֵעִיקְּרֵי הַתּוֹרָה, וְאִם כֵּן קָשֶׁה לְהָבִין אֵיךְ מֵחֲמָתָם חָרְבָה יְרוּשָׁלַיִם.
  1. Shabbos 119b. ↩
  2. Bava Metzia 30b. ↩
In shortHow could failing to rebuke, treating great and small alike, and keeping to strict law destroy Yerushalayim, when these are not basic sins?
3We may explain all this on the basis of what the sefer Knesses Yechezkel writes. The expression “they let their hands grow slack” hints at greeting one's fellow, since it is the custom to give him one's hand when asking after his welfare. Chazal were hinting at something that often happens. When a person, Heaven forbid, keeps up a quarrel with his fellow, he will not give him his hand in greeting, and he even claims to have proof from the Torah that he is right to behave this way. This is “they let their hands grow slack from the Torah”: they let their hands go slack and weak rather than offer their fellow peace, and they held on to the quarrel. What is more, they said they had support for this “from the Torah,” for they imagined that the Torah permits such behavior and even calls for it. That is the gist of his words. Admittedly, these words were said as a playful turn of phrase. Even so, this is the very root that gives the yetzer hara a place and a foothold to entrench itself among our people through the great sin of strife and baseless hatred, and that yetzer still runs riot among us.
וְיֵשׁ לוֹמַר בְּכָל זֶה, עַל יְסוֹד מַה שֶּׁכָּתַב בְּסֵפֶר כְּנֶסֶת יְחֶזְקֵאל, שֶׁלָּשׁוֹן ׳רָפוּ יְדֵיהֶם׳ רוֹמֵז עַל עִנְיַן דְּרִישַׁת שָׁלוֹם חֲבֵרוֹ, שֶׁהַמִּנְהָג לָתֵת יָד לַחֲבֵרוֹ כְּשֶׁדּוֹרֵשׁ שְׁלוֹמוֹ, וְרָמְזוּ חז״ל בָּזֶה עַל מַה שֶׁמָּצוּי, שֶׁכַּאֲשֶׁר מַחֲזִיק ח״ו בְּמַחֲלוֹקֶת עִם חֲבֵרוֹ, אֲזַי לֹא יִתֵּן לוֹ יָדוֹ לְשָׁלוֹם, וְאַף טוֹעֵן שֶׁיֵּשׁ לוֹ רְאָיָה מִן הַתּוֹרָה שֶׁעִמּוֹ הַצֶּדֶק לְהַנְהָגָתוֹ זֹאת. וְזֶהוּ ׳שֶׁרָפוּ יְדֵיהֶם מִן הַתּוֹרָה׳, שֶׁרָפוּ וְהֶחֱלִישׁוּ יְדֵיהֶם מִלִּיתֵּן שָׁלוֹם לַחֲבֵרוֹ, אֶלָּא הֶחֱזִיקוּ בְּמַחֲלוֹקֶת, וְעוֹד זֹאת שֶׁאָמְרוּ שֶׁיֵּשׁ לָהֶם סֶמֶךְ לָזֶה מִן הַתּוֹרָה, שֶׁדִּימּוּ בְּמַחְשַׁבְתָּם שֶׁמִּן הַתּוֹרָה מוּתָּר וְרָאוּי לִנְהוֹג כֵּן, עכ״ד. וְאִם אָמְנָם שֶׁהַדְּבָרִים נֶאֶמְרוּ בְּדֶרֶךְ צַחוּת, מִכָּל מָקוֹם הֲרֵי זֶהוּ הַשּׁוֹרֶשׁ אֲשֶׁר עַל יָדוֹ מוֹצֵא הַיֵּצֶר מָקוֹם וַאֲחִיזָה לְהִתְגַּדֵּר אֵצֶל בְּנֵי עַמֵּינוּ, בַּחֵטְא הַגָּדוֹל שֶׁל מַחֲלוֹקֶת וְשִׂנְאַת חִינָּם אֲשֶׁר עֲדַיִין יֵצֶר זֶה מְרַקֵּד בֵּינֵינוּ.
In shortThe Knesses Yechezkel reads slack hands as a hand withheld in a quarrel, claiming Torah proof; this, the Rebbe adds, is the root of strife.
4The Torah gives the remedy for this here: “and they encamped in the Wilderness of Sinai.” Let a person attain the middah of humility, the trait of character that makes him like the Wilderness of Sinai, which made itself lower than all the mountains.6 Then all those “proofs” he imagined, that it is right to rise up, start a quarrel and hold on to the dispute, fall away of themselves, for arrogance is the main cause of all quarrel and strife. In this way he will be privileged to fulfill “they journeyed from Refidim”: every ground and reason for holding on to the quarrel will journey away and depart from his heart. And when the middah of humility dwells in his heart, he will be privileged to truly receive the Torah, as we find at Mount Sinai, and to see what the Torah really wants.
וְהָעֵצָה כְּנֶגֶד זֶה אָמְרָה הַתּוֹרָה כָּאן, שֶׁהוּא עַל יְדֵי ׳וַיַּחֲנוּ בְּמִדְבַּר סִינַי׳, שֶׁכַּאֲשֶׁר יָבוֹא לְמִידַּת עֲנָוָה לִהְיוֹת בִּבְחִינַת מִדְבַּר סִינַי שֶׁהִנְמִיךְ עַצְמוֹ מִכָּל הֶהָרִים, עַל יְדֵי זֶה מִמֵּילָא יִתְבַּטְּלוּ כָּל רְאָיוֹתָיו הַלָּלוּ שֶׁדִּימָּה בְּמַחְשַׁבְתּוֹ שֶׁרָאוּי בָּזֶה לָקוּם וְלַעֲשׂוֹת רִיב וּלְהַחֲזִיק בְּמַחֲלוֹקֶת, כִּי הַגֵּיאוּת הוּא עִיקָּר הַגּוֹרֵם לְכָל רִיב וּמָדוֹן, וְעַל יְדֵי זֶה יִזְכֶּה לְ׳וַיִּסְעוּ מֵרְפִידִים׳, שֶׁיִּסַּע וְיִסְתַּלֵּק מִלִּבּוֹ כָּל מָקוֹם וְטַעַם לְהַחְזִיק בְּמַחֲלוֹקֶת. וְכַאֲשֶׁר תִּשְׁכּוֹן בְּלִבּוֹ מִידַּת הָעֲנָוָה, אָז יִזְכֶּה לְקַבָּלַת הַתּוֹרָה בֶּאֱמֶת כַּאֲשֶׁר מָצִינוּ בְּהַר סִינַי, וְיִזְכֶּה לִרְאוֹת בֶּאֱמֶת מַהוּ רְצוֹן הַתּוֹרָה.
  1. See Sotah 5a: the Holy One, blessed be He, passed over all the mountains and hills and rested His Shechinah on Mount Sinai, and did not raise Mount Sinai up to Him. ↩
In shortHumility, the lowliness of Sinai, dissolves the proofs that feed a quarrel, drives strife from the heart and opens it to the Torah's true will.
5aWe have seen that the root and source of the whole sin of strife is pride and haughtiness, which make a person see only his own way as right and look down on his fellows. This lets us understand why Chazal blamed the destruction of Yerushalayim on their failure to rebuke one another. That failure shows how great the arrogance in each one's heart was: so great that no one had any bond with his fellow. Not only could they not accept rebuke from one another; they did not even rebuke one another.
וְעַל פִּי הַמְּבוֹאָר דְּשׁוֹרֶשׁ וְאִם כָּל חַטַּאת הַמַּחֲלוֹקֶת הוּא הַגֵּאוּת וְגַסּוּת הָרוּחַ, הַנּוֹתֵן בְּלִבּוֹ שֶׁל אָדָם לִרְאוֹת אֲשֶׁר רַק דַּרְכּוֹ יָשָׁר בְּעֵינָיו וְלָבוֹז לַחֲבֵירָיו, יוּבָן מַה שֶׁתָּלוּ חז״ל חֻרְבַּן יְרוּשָׁלַיִם עַל שֶׁלֹּא הוֹכִיחוּ זֶה אֶת זֶה, כִּי זֶהוּ מוֹרֶה עַל גּוֹדֶל הַגֵּיאוּת שֶׁהָיְתָה בְּלֵב כָּל אֶחָד, עַד שֶׁעַל יְדֵי זֶה לֹא הָיָה שַׁיָּיכוּת לְאֶחָד עִם חֲבֵרוֹ, וְלֹא רַק שֶׁלֹּא הָיוּ יְכוֹלִים לְקַבֵּל תּוֹכָחָה אֶחָד מֵחֲבֵרוֹ, אֶלָּא אַף לֹא הוֹכִיחוּ זֶה אֶת זֶה,
5bIt is like the way some sefarim explain the Mishnah: “Two who sit together with no words of Torah between them, this is a session of scoffers.”7 Why would two people sit together and say no words of Torah to each other? It can only be because each one scorns and mocks the other, so much that he does not consider him worth speaking to or having any bond with. This is also the meaning of “small and great were made equal.” There was so little bond between them, and each mocked all his companions so much, that they all became equal in his eyes. Even a great man seemed to him no different from a small one, and he could not see that anyone was greater than himself.
כְּדֶרֶךְ שֶׁפֵּירְשׁוּ בַּסְּפָרִים הַקְּדוֹשִׁים מַה שֶׁשָּׁנִינוּ (אבות ג, ב) שְׁנַיִם שֶׁיּוֹשְׁבִים וְאֵין בֵּינֵיהֶם דִּבְרֵי תוֹרָה הֲרֵי זֶה מוֹשַׁב לֵצִים, הַיְינוּ דְּהַטַּעַם לָזֶה שֶׁשְּׁנַיִם יוֹשְׁבִים וְאֵין מְדַבְּרִים בֵּינֵיהֶם שׁוּם דִּיבּוּרֵי תּוֹרָה, אֵין זֶה אֶלָּא מִשּׁוּם דְּכָל אֶחָד בַּז וּמִתְלוֹצֵץ מֵחֲבֵירוֹ, עַד שֶׁאֵינוֹ מַחְשִׁיבוֹ בְּעֵינָיו שֶׁיְּהֵא רָאוּי לְדַבֵּר עִמּוֹ וְלִהְיוֹת לוֹ אֵיזֶה הִתְחַבְּרוּת עִמּוֹ. וְזֶהוּ גַּם מַה שֶׁאָמְרוּ שֶׁהוּשְׁוּו קָטָן וְגָדוֹל, שֶׁכָּל כָּךְ לֹא הָיָה בֵּינֵיהֶם שׁוּם הִתְחַבְּרוּת זֶה עִם זֶה, וְהָיָה כָּל אֶחָד מִתְלוֹצֵץ מִכָּל שְׁאָר רֵיעָיו, עַד שֶׁכּוּלָּם הוּשְׁוּו בְּעֵינָיו, שֶׁגַּם הַגָּדוֹל הָיָה נִרְאֶה בְּעֵינָיו שָׁוֶה לְקָטָן, וּבַל יוּכַל לִרְאוֹת שֶׁיֵּשׁ אֵי מִי גָּדוֹל מִמֶּנּוּ.
  1. Avos 3:2. ↩
In shortPride left no bond between people: they neither rebuked one another nor honored the great, since each scorned the rest and saw none above himself.
6This is also the meaning of “Yerushalayim was destroyed only because they based their judgments on Torah law.” When there was quarrel and strife among them, they rested their words on words of Torah, bringing proofs from the Torah that here it was right to hold on to the dispute, just as we saw with “they let their hands grow slack from the Torah.” Had they had the middah of humility, they would have entered lifnim mishuras hadin, “inside the line of the law,” going beyond its letter. That is, they would have seen into the depth of the Torah's true will. Arrogance would not have blinded them, and all division between their hearts would have vanished.
וְזֶהוּ גַּם מַה שֶׁאָמְרוּ לֹא חָרְבָה יְרוּשָׁלַיִם אֶלָּא עַל שֶׁהֶעֱמִידוּ דִּינֵיהֶם עַל דִּין תּוֹרָה, הַיְינוּ שֶׁכַּאֲשֶׁר הָיָה בֵּינֵיהֶם רִיב וּמָדוֹן, הֶעֱמִידוּ וְתָלוּ דִּבְרֵיהֶם עַל דִּבְרֵי תוֹרָה, שֶׁהֵבִיאוּ רְאָיוֹת מִן הַתּוֹרָה שֶׁרָאוּי לְהַחְזִיק כָּאן בְּמַחֲלוֹקֶת, וְעַל דֶּרֶךְ הַנִּזְכָּר לְעֵיל לְגַבֵּי ׳רָפוּ יְדֵיהֶם מִן הַתּוֹרָה׳, וְאִילּוּ הָיָה בָּהֶם מִידַּת הָעֲנָוָה הָיוּ נִכְנָסִים לִפְנִים מִשּׁוּרַת הַדִּין, הַיְינוּ שֶׁהָיוּ רוֹאִים עוֹמֶק אֲמִיתַּת רְצוֹן הַתּוֹרָה, וְלֹא הָיָה הַגֵּיאוּת מְסַמֵּא אֶת עֵינֵיהֶם, וְהָיָה מִתְבַּטֵּל מִלִּבָּם כָּל פֵּירוּד לְבָבוֹת.
In shortArrogance dressed strife in Torah proofs; humility would have led them “inside the line,” into the Torah's true will, and healed the division of hearts.
7Indeed, the truth is the very opposite: as is well known, the Torah can truly be kept only through unity. On “And Israel encamped there,” Rashi, citing the Mechilta, explains: “As one man with one heart.”8 And the Ohr HaChaim, the Derech Pikudecha and the Yismach Moshe write that there are many mitzvos that can be fulfilled only when Jews join together and become part of one another.9 In this way even the mitzvos that apply only to Kohanim, or only to Yisraelim, Jews who are not Kohanim, are counted for each person as though he had fulfilled them. That is why the tzaddikim instituted the practice of saying, before a mitzvah, “LeShem Yichud … in the name of all Israel.” But if, Heaven forbid, people hate one another, then, Heaven forbid, the keeping of the Torah and mitzvos is undone. That is why the Beis HaMikdash was destroyed, for the whole purpose of entering the Land and building the Beis HaMikdash is only to fulfill the 613 mitzvos.
וּבֶאֱמֶת אַדְּרַבָּה הֲרֵי מְבוֹאָר וְיָדוּעַ שֶׁעִיקַּר קִיּוּם הַתּוֹרָה אִי אֶפְשָׁר אֶלָּא עַל יְדֵי אַחְדוּת, וְכִדְאִיתָא (רש״י ממכילתא שמות יט, ב) ״וַיִּחַן שָׁם יִשְׂרָאֵל״ כְּאִישׁ אֶחָד בְּלֵב אֶחָד, וְכִדְאִיתָא בַּסְּפָרִים הַקְּדוֹשִׁים (אור החיים פקודי לט, לב, דרך פיקודך הקדמה ג׳ אות ב׳, ישמח משה שמות) שֶׁיֶּשְׁנָם הַרְבֵּה מִצְוֹות שֶׁאִי אֶפְשָׁר לְקַיְּימָם אֶלָּא עַל יְדֵי הַהִתְחַבְּרוּת וְהַהִתְכַּלְּלוּת זֶה עִם זֶה, שֶׁעַל יְדֵי זֶה גַּם הַמִּצְוֹות הַנּוֹהֲגִים רַק בְּכֹהֲנִים אוֹ רַק בְּיִשְׂרְאֵלִים, נֶחְשָׁבִים לְכָל אֶחָד כְּאִילּוּ קִיְּימָם, וְעַל כֵּן תִּיקְּנוּ הַצַּדִּיקִים לוֹמַר ׳לְשֵׁם יִחוּד וְכוּ׳ בְּשֵׁם כָּל יִשְׂרָאֵל׳. וּבְאִם ח״ו שׂוֹנְאִים אֶחָד אֶת הַשֵּׁנִי, עַל יְדֵי זֶה מִתְבַּטֵּל ח״ו קִיּוּם הַתּוֹרָה וְהַמִּצְוֹות, וְלָכֵן נֶחֱרַב הַבַּיִת, דְּכָל עִנְיַן בִּיאַת הָאָרֶץ וּבִנְיַן הַבַּיִת הוּא רַק עַל מְנָת לְקַיֵּים תרי״ג מִצְוֹות.
  1. Shemos 19:2; Rashi there, from the Mechilta. ↩
  2. Ohr HaChaim, Pekudei, on Shemos 39:32; Derech Pikudecha, Introduction 3, §2; Yismach Moshe, Shemos. ↩
In shortThe Torah is kept only in unity, since many mitzvos are fulfilled together; hatred undoes this, and so the Beis HaMikdash was destroyed.
8May the Holy One, blessed be He, help us keep the Torah within chaburos shel mitzvah, fellowships joined for a mitzvah. And may Chazal's words be fulfilled in us: “Israel will not be redeemed until it forms one band.”10 Amen, may it be His will.
הקב״ה יַעֲזוֹר שֶׁנּוּכַל לְקַיֵּים הַתּוֹרָה מִתּוֹךְ חֲבוּרוֹת שֶׁל מִצְוָה, וִיקוּיַּים בָּנוּ מַה שֶׁאָמְרוּ (מדרש תנחומא נצבים א) שֶׁאֵין יִשְׂרָאֵל נִגְאָלִים אֶלָּא כְּשֶׁהֵם בַּאֲגוּדָּה אַחַת, אָמֵן כֵּן יְהִי רָצוֹן:
  1. Midrash Tanchuma, Nitzavim 1. ↩
In shortMay we keep the Torah in fellowships of mitzvah and be redeemed as one band.
Takeaway

In a quarrel the heart quickly finds “Torah proofs” for holding on, and that is what it means to let our hands grow slack from the Torah. The humility of Sinai makes those proofs fall away, so that we can offer our hand in peace and see what the Torah truly wants. And since so many mitzvos are fulfilled only together, joining ourselves to all Israel brings the redemption near.

Learn this in the merit of Rav Dovid Matisyohu Rabinowitz. His yahrzeit and life ›

All of Lehavas David

English translation, notes and summaries © Zechusam.