Zeal Makes Every Offering New
From the Torah ofRav Dovid Matisyohu Rabinowitzהרב דוד מתתיהו בן יחיאל יהושע רבינוביץProfile ›
Bamidbar 7:17
וּלְזֶבַח הַשְּׁלָמִים בָּקָר שְׁנַיִם אֵילִם חֲמִשָּׁה עַתּוּדִים חֲמִשָּׁה כְּבָשִׂים בְּנֵי־שָׁנָה חֲמִשָּׁה זֶה קׇרְבַּן נַחְשׁוֹן בֶּן־עַמִּינָדָב
And for the peace offering: two cattle, five rams, five he-goats, five yearling lambs. This is the offering of Nachshon son of Aminadav.
1“This is the offering of Nachshon son of Aminadav.”1 Chazal said in the Midrash: “R' Yehudah says: The offering of the princes is as dear to the Holy One, blessed be He, as the song that Israel sang at the sea. In the song that Israel sang at the sea it says, ‘This is my God and I will glorify Him,’ and here it says, ‘This is the offering of Nachshon son of Aminadav.’”2 The holy sefarim Yitav Lev, Sfas Emes and Shem MiShmuel raise the question: what connection is there between the Song of the Sea and the offerings of the princes?3
זֶה קָרְבַּן נַחְשׁוֹן בֶּן עַמִּינָדָב (ז, יז). אָמְרוּ חז״ל בַּמִּדְרָשׁ (ויקרא רבה ח, ג), רַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר חָבִיב קָרְבָּנָן שֶׁל נְשִׂיאִים לִפְנֵי הקב״ה כְּשִׁירָה שֶׁאָמְרוּ יִשְׂרָאֵל בַּיָּם, שִׁירָה שֶׁאָמְרוּ יִשְׂרָאֵל בַּיָּם (שמות טו, ב) ״זֶה אֵלִי וְאַנְוֵהוּ״, וְכָאן כְּתִיב (ז, יז) ״זֶה קָרְבַּן נַחְשׁוֹן בֶּן עַמִּינָדָב״. וְעָמְדוּ בָּזֶה בַּסְּפָרִים הַקְּדוֹשִׁים (ייטב לב שפת אמת ושם משמואל פרשת צו) מַה שַׁיָּיכוּת אִיכָּא בֵּין שִׁירַת הַיָּם לְקָרְבְּנוֹת הַנְּשִׂיאִים.
- Bamidbar 7:17. Nachshon, prince of the tribe of Yehudah, was the first of the twelve princes of the tribes to bring his offering at the dedication of the altar. ↩
- Vayikra Rabbah 8:3; Shemos 15:2. Both phrases begin with the word zeh, “this.” ↩
- Yitav Lev, Sfas Emes and Shem MiShmuel, Tzav. ↩
In shortThe Midrash likens the princes' offerings to the Song of the Sea, both said with zeh; what do the two really share?
2The Midrash there goes on: “R' Nechemiah said: The offering of the princes is as dear to the Holy One, blessed be He, as the two Tablets of the Covenant. Of the two Tablets of the Covenant it is written, ‘On this side and on that side they were written,’ and here it is written, ‘This is the offering of Nachshon son of Aminadav.’”4 Here too we must explain the connection between them.
עוֹד אִיתָא שָׁם בַּמִּדְרָשׁ, רַבִּי נְחֶמְיָה אָמַר חָבִיב קָרְבָּנָן שֶׁל נְשִׂיאִים לִפְנֵי הקב״ה כִּשְׁנֵי לוּחוֹת הַבְּרִית, בִּשְׁנֵי לוּחוֹת הַבְּרִית כְּתִיב (שמות לב, טו) ״מִזֶּה וּמִזֶּה הֵם כְּתוּבִים״, וְכָאן כְּתִיב ״זֶה קָרְבַּן נַחְשׁוֹן בֶּן עַמִּינָדָב״, וְגַם כָּאן צָרִיךְ בֵּיאוּר הַשַּׁיָּיכוֹת בֵּינֵיהֶם.
- Vayikra Rabbah 8:3; Shemos 32:15. “On this side and on that side” renders mizeh umizeh, again the word zeh. ↩
In shortR' Nechemiah likens the princes' offerings to the Tablets, again through zeh, and this link too needs explaining.
3I have seen someone explain it this way. He first asks why the Torah repeats the passage of the princes' offerings so many times, writing out every offering of each prince in detail. This seems unnecessary; it would have been enough to write it once, since all twelve brought the same offerings. But the Midrash explains at length that each prince had a different intention in his offerings, one that belonged to his own tribe.5 So by repeating all these verses, the Torah teaches us that each person brings a special quality and power of his own to every mitzvah he does, in which he is unlike anyone else.
וְרָאִיתִי מִי שֶׁבֵּיאֵר, דְּהִנֵּה צָרִיךְ בֵּיאוּר מַדּוּעַ חָזְרָה הַתּוֹרָה וּכְפָלָהּ אֶת פָּרָשַׁת קָרְבָּנוֹת הַנְּשִׂיאִים כָּל כָּךְ הַרְבֵּה פְּעָמִים, שֶׁנִּכְתַּב בְּכָל נָשִׂיא וְנָשִׂיא בִּפְרָטוּת כָּל קָרְבְּנוֹתָיו לְלֹא צוֹרֶךְ לִכְאוֹרָה, וְהָיָה דַּי לִכְתּוֹב כֵּן פַּעַם אַחַת. אַךְ הִנֵּה מְבוֹאָר בַּמִּדְרָשׁ בַּאֲרוּכָּה (במדבר רבה יג, יב־כ, יד, א־יג), כִּי לְכָל נָשִׂיא הָיְתָה בְּקָרְבְּנוֹתָיו כַּוָּונָה אַחֶרֶת הַשַּׁיֶּיכֶת לְשִׁבְטוֹ, אִם כֵּן בָּזֶה שֶׁחָזְרָה הַתּוֹרָה וּכְפָלָהּ לָנוּ כָּל אֵלּוּ הַפְּסוּקִים, מוֹרֶה לָנוּ הַתּוֹרָה בָּזֶה שֶׁלְּכָל אֶחָד וְאֶחָד יֵשׁ מַעֲלָה וְכֹחַ מְיוּחָד בְּכָל מִצְוָה שֶׁעוֹשֶׂה, שֶׁאֵינוֹ דּוֹמֶה בָּזֶה לַחֲבֵירוֹ.
- Bamidbar Rabbah 13:12–20; 14:1–13. ↩
In shortOne explanation: the Torah repeats each identical offering because each prince had his own intention, so each person brings something unique to every mitzvah.
4That is why Chazal compared the princes' offering to the Song of the Sea, since both use the word zeh, “this.” The word zeh indicates that each person has his own grasp and his own special quality. So it was at the Song of the Sea. As is well known, Bnei Yisrael were then privileged to grasp such lofty things that all of them answered as one and said, “This is my God.” Yet their grasp was not equal; each one grasped according to his own level. That is also why Chazal compared the princes' offerings to the two Tablets of the Covenant, of which zeh is said. The same holds for Torah study: although everyone learns the same Torah of Moshe, each one grasps Hashem's Torah according to his own capacity. That is the gist of his words.
וְזֶהוּ שֶׁדִּימּוּ חז״ל קָרְבָּנָם שֶׁל הַנְּשִׂיאִים לְשִׁירַת הַיָּם שֶׁבִּשְׁנֵיהֶם נֶאֱמַר לְשׁוֹן ׳זֶה׳, דְּלָשׁוֹן ׳זֶה׳ מוֹרֶה עַל כָּךְ שֶׁלְּכָל אֶחָד יֵשׁ הַשָּׂגָה וּמַעֲלָה מְיוּחֶדֶת מִשֶּׁלּוֹ, וְכֵן הָיָה בְּשִׁירַת הַיָּם שֶׁכַּיָּדוּעַ זָכוּ אָז לְהַשָּׂגוֹת גְּדוֹלוֹת עַד שֶׁכּוּלָּם כְּאֶחָד עָנוּ וְאָמְרוּ ׳זֶה אֵלִי׳, אֲבָל מִכָּל מָקוֹם לֹא הָיְתָה הַשָּׂגַת כּוּלָּם שָׁוָה אֶלָּא כָּל אֶחָד הִשִּׂיג לְפִי מַדְרֵגָתוֹ. וְזֶהוּ שֶׁדִּימּוּ קָרְבְּנוֹת הַנְּשִׂיאִים גַּם לִשְׁנֵי לוּחוֹת הַבְּרִית שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר בָּהֶם ׳זֶה׳, דִּכְמוֹ כֵּן הוּא גַּם בְּעִנְיַן לִימּוּד הַתּוֹרָה, דְּאַף שֶׁכּוּלָּם לוֹמְדִים אֶת אוֹתָהּ תּוֹרַת מֹשֶׁה, מִכָּל מָקוֹם כָּל אֶחָד מַשִּׂיג לְפִי כּוֹחוֹ בְּתוֹרַת ה׳, עכת״ד.
In shortZeh marks each person's own grasp: all said “This is my God” and all learn one Torah, yet each grasps according to his own level.
5We can also explain all this another way. First, let us look closely at the Midrash's wording. Why does it quote “This is the offering of Nachshon son of Aminadav”? The same words are said of every one of the princes, so the Midrash could have said that in the princes' offerings “This is the offering” is written of each one. Why did it single out Nachshon's offering? We may say that this very detail makes the comparison to the Song of the Sea clear, in light of a saying of Chazal: “Why was he called Nachshon? Because he went down first into the nachshol, the surging waves of the sea. R' Shimon bar Yochai said: The Holy One, blessed be He, said to Moshe, ‘Whoever sanctified My Name shall offer first.’”6 For Nachshon leapt first into the Red Sea with zeal and with mesirus nefesh, the readiness to give one's life. As Chazal say in the Gemara: “Nachshon son of Aminadav leapt and went down into the sea first, and of him it is said, ‘Save me, God, for the waters have come up to the soul …’”7 Through him all of Bnei Yisrael were privileged to see the sea split: they saw what he did and did the same.
וּבְאוֹפֶן אַחֵר אֶפְשָׁר לְפָרֵשׁ כָּל זֶה, וּבְהֶקְדֵּם לְדַקְדֵּק מַה שֶׁהֵבִיא הַמִּדְרָשׁ דַּוְקָא לְשׁוֹן הַפָּסוּק ׳זֶה קָרְבַּן נַחְשׁוֹן בֶּן עַמִּינָדָב׳, וְלִכְאוֹרָה לָשׁוֹן זֶה נֶאֱמַר בְּכָל הַנְּשִׂיאִים וְאִם כֵּן הָיָה יָכוֹל לוֹמַר שֶׁבְּקָרְבְּנוֹת הַנְּשִׂיאִים כְּתִיב ׳זֶה קָרְבָּן׳ בְּכָל נָשִׂיא וְנָשִׂיא, וְלָמָּה הִזְכִּיר קָרְבַּן נַחְשׁוֹן דַּוְקָא. אַךְ יֵשׁ לוֹמַר שֶׁבָּזֶה דַּיְיקָא מוּבָן הַדִּימּוּי לְשִׁירַת הַיָּם, וְעַל פִּי מַאֲמַר חז״ל (במדבר רבה יג, ז) לָמָּה נִקְרָא שְׁמוֹ נַחְשׁוֹן שֶׁיָּרַד תְּחִילָּה לַנַּחְשׁוֹל שֶׁבַּיָּם, אָמַר רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן יוֹחַאי אָמַר הקב״ה לְמֹשֶׁה מִי שֶׁקִּידֵּשׁ אֶת שְׁמִי הוּא יַקְרִיב תְּחִילָּה. דְּהִנֵּה נַחְשׁוֹן בֶּן עַמִּינָדָב קָפַץ רִאשׁוֹן לַיָּם סוֹף בִּזְרִיזוּת וּמְסִירוּת נֶפֶשׁ, וּכְדִבְרֵי חז״ל בַּגְּמָרָא (סוטה לז, א) קָפַץ נַחְשׁוֹן בֶּן עַמִּינָדָב וְיָרַד לַיָּם תְּחִילָּה וְעָלָיו נֶאֱמַר הוֹשִׁיעֵנִי אֱלֹקִים כִּי בָאוּ מַיִם עַד נָפֶשׁ וְכוּ׳, וְעַל יָדוֹ זָכוּ כּוּלָּם לִבְקִיעַת הַיָּם, וּמִמֶּנּוּ רָאוּ וְכֵן עָשׂוּ.
In shortThe Midrash names Nachshon because he leapt first into the sea with zeal and mesirus nefesh, bringing the splitting and moving everyone to follow.
6The princes' offerings also show the middah of zeal, the character trait that made them hurry to bring their offerings first, of their own accord. As Chazal relate, when the Mishkan was being made, the princes said, “Let the people bring what they will bring, and whatever is lacking, we will fill in.” But within two mornings the community had brought the entire donation, and the princes were distressed, and so on. Once the Mishkan was finished, they were quick to bring an offering first, with zeal, as it is written, “And the princes of Israel offered …” They said, “Now is the time for us to bring offerings in joy, for the Shechinah has rested on the work of our hands …”8 We can now see clearly why Chazal compared the princes' offerings to the Song of the Sea. Just as at the sea Nachshon rose through the middah of zeal and mesirus nefesh, so here he roused that middah among the other princes, and that is why they brought their offerings for the dedication of the altar.
וְעִנְיַן קָרְבְּנוֹת הַנְּשִׂיאִים מוֹרֶה גַּם כֵּן עַל מִידַּת הַזְּרִיזוּת שֶׁנִּזְדָּרְזוּ וְהֵבִיאוּ מֵעַצְמָם תְּחִילָּה, כְּמַאֲמַר חז״ל (תנחומא פקודי יא, במדבר רבה יב, טז) שֶׁבִּמְלֶאכֶת הַמִּשְׁכָּן אָמְרוּ הַנְּשִׂיאִים יָבִיאוּ הָעָם מַה שֶׁיָּבִיאוּ וּמַה שֶׁיַּחְסְרוּ נְמַלֵּא אֲנַחְנוּ, וְלִשְׁנֵי בְּקָרִים הֵבִיאוּ הַצִּיבּוּר כָּל הַנְּדָבָה, וְהָיוּ הַנְּשִׂיאִים מְצֵירִים וְכוּ׳, כֵּיוָן שֶׁנִּגְמַר הַמִּשְׁכָּן הִקְדִּימוּ וְהֵבִיאוּ קָרְבָּן בִּזְרִיזוּת, הֲדָא הוּא דִכְתִיב ״וַיַּקְרִיבוּ נְשִׂיאֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל״ וְגוֹ׳, אָמְרוּ הֲרֵי הַשָּׁעָה שֶׁנַּקְרִיב קָרְבָּנוֹת בְּשִׂמְחָה שֶׁשָּׁרְתָה שְׁכִינָה בְּמַעֲשֵׂה יָדֵינוּ וְכוּ׳. וְאִם כֵּן מוּבָן הֵיטֵב שֶׁדִּימּוּ חז״ל קָרְבְּנוֹת הַנְּשִׂיאִים לְשִׁירַת הַיָּם, שֶׁכְּשֵׁם שֶׁבַּיָּם נִתְעַלָּה נַחְשׁוֹן בְּמִידַּת הַזְּרִיזוּת וּמְסִירוּת נֶפֶשׁ, כָּךְ כָּאן עוֹרֵר מִידָּה זוֹ בְּקֶרֶב שְׁאָר נְשִׂיאִים, אֲשֶׁר עַל כֵּן הֵבִיאוּ קָרְבָּנָם לַחֲנוּכַּת הַמִּזְבֵּחַ.
- Midrash Tanchuma, Pekudei 11; Bamidbar Rabbah 12:16; Bamidbar 7:2. ↩
In shortNachshon's zeal at the sea roused the other princes to hurry with their offerings, which is why these are likened to the Song.
7So too with Torah study. As is well known, zeal and renewal with mesirus nefesh are among the main ways through which the Torah is acquired.9 That is why the Midrash also likens the princes' offering to the two Tablets of the Covenant and the receiving of the Torah.
וּכְמוֹ כֵּן הוּא לְגַבֵּי לִימּוּד הַתּוֹרָה, אֲשֶׁר מִידַּת הַזְּרִיזוּת וְהַהִתְחַדְּשׁוּת בִּמְסִירוּת נֶפֶשׁ הוּא מֵהַקִּנְיָנִים הָעִיקָּרִיִּים שֶׁהַתּוֹרָה נִקְנֵית בָּהֶם כַּיָּדוּעַ, וְזֶהוּ שֶׁמְּדַמֶּה הַמִּדְרָשׁ קָרְבַּן הַנְּשִׂיאִים גַּם לִשְׁנֵי לוּחוֹת הַבְּרִית וּלְקַבָּלַת הַתּוֹרָה.
- See Avos 6:6, which lists the forty-eight ways through which the Torah is acquired. ↩
In shortZeal and renewal with mesirus nefesh are among the main ways to acquire Torah, so the offerings are also likened to the Tablets.
8This lets us understand why the Torah repeats the princes' offerings in detail so many times. From the princes' zeal we are to learn that even when a person does the same act many times, zeal renews him, and his deed counts as something new and entirely different. Our holy Torah teaches us this by repeating each prince's offering again and again. Although the offerings themselves were identical in number, each prince brought them with a fresh spirit, and so the same offering was like a new and entirely different one.
וּבָזֶה נָבִין הַטַּעַם שֶׁחָזְרָה וּכְפָלָהּ הַתּוֹרָה קָרְבְּנוֹת הַנְּשִׂיאִים בִּפְרָטוּת כָּל כָּךְ הַרְבֵּה פְּעָמִים, כִּי מִמִּידַּת הַזְּרִיזוּת שֶׁל הַנְּשִׂיאִים יֵשׁ לָנוּ לִלְמוֹד, שֶׁאַף עַל פִּי שֶׁעוֹשִׂים אוֹתוֹ מַעֲשֶׂה כַּמָּה פְּעָמִים, אַךְ עַל יְדֵי הַזְּרִיזוּת נַעֲשֵׂית הִתְחַדְּשׁוּת בָּאָדָם וְנֶחְשָׁב מַעֲשֵׂהוּ כְּדָבָר חָדָשׁ וְשׁוֹנֶה לְגַמְרֵי, וְדָבָר זֶה מוֹרֶה וּמְלַמֶּדֶת לָנוּ תּוֹרָתֵנוּ הַקְּדוֹשָׁה בַּמֶּה שֶׁכְּפָלָהּ שׁוּב וָשׁוּב קָרְבַּן כָּל נָשִׂיא, לְהַרְאוֹת שֶׁאַף שֶׁהַקָּרְבָּנוֹת עַצְמָם הָיוּ שָׁוִים בְּמִנְיָנָם, אַךְ כֵּיוָן שֶׁכָּל נָשִׂיא וְנָשִׂיא הִקְרִיבָם מִתּוֹךְ הִתְחַדְּשׁוּת, הָיָה אוֹתוֹ הַקָּרְבָּן כְּקָרְבָּן חָדָשׁ וְאַחֵר לְגַמְרֵי.
In shortThe Torah repeats each identical offering because zeal renews a person, making a repeated deed entirely new.
9We have just received the holy Torah on the festival of Shavuos, and the Torah brings a person to zeal, as we know from the saying of R' Pinchas ben Yair.10 So we must make an effort to work on zeal, for it helps greatly in avodas Hashem, the service of Hashem, and in the daily routine of every person on earth.
וְכָעֵת אַחַר שֶׁקִּבַּלְנוּ אֶת הַתּוֹרָה הַקְּדוֹשָׁה בְּחַג הַשָּׁבוּעוֹת, וְתוֹרָה מְבִיאָה לִידֵי זְרִיזוּת, כַּיָּדוּעַ מִמַּאֲמַר רַבִּי פִּנְחָס בֶּן יָאִיר (עבודה זרה כ, ב), וּבְכֵן צְרִיכִים לְהִשְׁתַּדֵּל בָּזֶה לַעֲבוֹד עַל עִנְיַן הַזְּרִיזוּת, כִּי זֶהוּ מוֹעִיל הַרְבֵּה לַעֲבוֹדַת הַבּוֹרֵא וּלְסֵדֶר הַיּוֹם שֶׁל כָּל אָדָם עֲלֵי אֲדָמוֹת.
- Avodah Zarah 20b. The saying is a ladder of qualities: “Torah brings a person to watchfulness, watchfulness brings him to zeal …” ↩
In shortThe Torah received on Shavuos brings a person to zeal, so now we must work on it, in avodas Hashem and in every daily task.
10May it be His will that we be privileged to serve Him with zeal, to keep and fulfill all the words of the Torah. Amen.
יְהִי רָצוֹן שֶׁנִּזְכֶּה לַעֲבוֹד אוֹתוֹ יִתְבָּרֵךְ מִתּוֹךְ זְרִיזוּת, לִשְׁמוֹר וּלְקַיֵּים אֶת כָּל דִּבְרֵי הַתּוֹרָה, אָמֵן:
In shortThe Rebbe prays that we serve Hashem with zeal and keep all the words of the Torah.
Takeaway
Much of our service repeats itself, as the twelve princes brought identical offerings, yet the Torah writes each one out in full. When a deed is done with zeal, the person is renewed and the deed becomes entirely new before Hashem. Like Nachshon, whose zeal roused those who came after him, we can work on zeal now that we have received the Torah, in our learning and in every part of our day.
Learn this in the merit of Rav Dovid Matisyohu Rabinowitz. His yahrzeit and life ›
English translation, notes and summaries © Zechusam.