Zechusamזכותם More
Noam Elimelech · Parshas Vayeira · Maamar יא From the Torah ofRebbe Elimelech of Lizhenskרבי אלימלך מליז'נסקProfile ›

The Fire and the Wood: Before Longing Cools

Avraham split the wood at home and carried it three days to Moriah. Was there no wood on the way? And why does Yitzchak say “the fire and the wood,” and ask for “the lamb for the burnt offering” rather than simply the offering?

Bereishis 22:7–8
וַיֹּאמֶר יִצְחָק אֶל־אַבְרָהָם אָבִיו וַיֹּאמֶר אָבִי וַיֹּאמֶר הִנֶּנִּי בְנִי וַיֹּאמֶר הִנֵּה הָאֵשׁ וְהָעֵצִים וְאַיֵּה הַשֶּׂה לְעֹלָה וַיֹּאמֶר אַבְרָהָם אֱלֹהִים יִרְאֶה־לּוֹ הַשֶּׂה לְעֹלָה בְּנִי וַיֵּלְכוּ שְׁנֵיהֶם יַחְדָּו
Yitzchak said to Avraham his father, “My father!” And he said, “Here I am, my son.” He said, “Here are the fire and the wood, but where is the lamb for the burnt offering?” And Avraham said, “God will see for Himself the lamb for the burnt offering, my son.” And the two of them went on together.
30Or we may explain these verses another way, as a lesson in doing a mitzvah while the longing still burns. At first glance, Yitzchak's words “Here are the fire and the wood” are puzzling. Why does he say them with the hei, the definite article: “the fire and the wood”? He should have said, “Here are fire and wood.” It seems we must first ask more. Why did Avraham have to take wood from his house and carry this load on a three-day journey? Was there no wood anywhere along the way? And even if you say he feared there might be no wood to be found along the whole way, why did he have to split the wood at home? He should have split it at the place where he would offer Yitzchak up. Also, why did Yitzchak say, “But where is the lamb for the burnt offering?” He should have said simply, “Where is the burnt offering?”
אוֹ יֹאמַר פֵּירוּשׁ הַפְּסוּקִים בְּדֶרֶךְ אַחֵר. דְּלִכְאוֹרָה יֵשׁ לְדַקְדֵּק בַּפָּסוּק "וַיֹּאמֶר יִצְחָק כּוּ' הִנֵּה הָאֵשׁ וְהָעֵצִים", לָמָּה אָמַר בְּה' הַיְּדִיעָה, הָיָה לוֹ לוֹמַר 'הִנֵּה אֵשׁ וְעֵצִים' כּוּ'. אַךְ נִרְאֶה דְּהִנֵּה עוֹד יֵשׁ לְהָבִין, לָמָּה הָיָה לוֹ לְאַבְרָהָם לִיקַּח עֵצִים מִבֵּיתוֹ לָשֵׂאת הַמַּשָּׂא זֹאת דֶּרֶךְ שְׁלֹשֶׁת יָמִים, וְכִי לֹא הָיָה עֵצִים בְּכָל הַדֶּרֶךְ הַזֶּה? גַּם אִם תֹּאמַר שֶׁהָיָה חוֹשֵׁשׁ פֶּן וְאוּלַי לֹא יִהְיֶה מָצוּי עֵצִים בְּכָל הַדֶּרֶךְ, עכ"פ לָמָּה הָיָה לוֹ לְבַקֵּעַ אֶת הָעֵצִים כָּאן, הָיָה לוֹ לְבַקֵּעַ בַּמָּקוֹם שֶׁהֶעֱלָהוּ לְעוֹלָה? גַּם לָמָּה אָמַר יִצְחָק "וְאַיֵּה הַשֶּׂה לְעוֹלָה", הָיָה לוֹ לוֹמַר סְתָם 'וְאַיֵּה עוֹלָה'?
In shortWhy “the fire and the wood,” why split the wood at home and carry it for three days, and why “the lamb for the burnt offering,” not simply “the burnt offering”?
31To understand it, we begin with the Creator, blessed be He, Who sanctified us with His mitzvos and commanded us to keep them. He has no need for us to do His mitzvos. Rather, the “pleasing aroma” before Him is the satisfaction that He spoke and His will was done.1 For what the Creator wants above all is that a person have a full and whole desire to do His will. It follows that “it is the intent of the heart that counts”:2 if a person sets his heart to do a mitzvah for Hashem's Name with a full and whole desire, it counts before Him at once as though he had already done it, since his intent is whole. Even so, a person must do the mitzvah and complete it in deed. For he cannot know his own intent clearly enough to be sure it is whole, with a full desire. Even if he imagines that his intent to do the mitzvah for Hashem's sake is whole, he should not believe himself until he completes the mitzvah. Such is the nature of the physical body: it keeps a person from thinking with a full and whole desire.
אַךְ הָעִנְיָן הוּא, דְּהִנֵּה הַבּוֹרֵא ב"ה וב"ש יִתְעַלֶּה אֲשֶׁר קִדְּשָׁנוּ בְּמִצְווֹתָיו וְצִיוָּנוּ לְקַיֵּים מִצְווֹתָיו, אֵין צוֹרֶךְ לוֹ יִתְבָּרֵךְ עֲשִׂיַּית מִצְווֹתָיו, רַק שֶׁזֶּה רֵיחַ נִיחוֹחַ לְפָנָיו יִתְבָּרֵךְ שֶׁאָמַר וְנַעֲשָׂה רְצוֹנוֹ, שֶׁעִיקַּר רְצוֹן הַבּוֹרֵא יִתְבָּרֵךְ הוּא שֶׁיִּהְיֶה לָאָדָם רָצוֹן מָלֵא וְשָׁלֵם לַעֲשׂוֹת רְצוֹנוֹ יִתְבָּרֵךְ, וְנִמְצָא 'אַחַר כַּוָּונַת הַלֵּב הֵן הֵן הַדְּבָרִים', אִם כִּיוֵּון לִבּוֹ לַעֲשׂוֹת אֵיזֶה מִצְוָה לִשְׁמוֹ יִתְבָּרֵךְ בְּרָצוֹן מָלֵא וְשָׁלֵם, חָשׁוּב לְפָנָיו יִתְבָּרֵךְ מִיָּד כְּאִילּוּ כְּבָר עֲשָׂאָהּ מֵאַחַר שֶׁכַּוָּונָתוֹ שְׁלֵימָה, ואעפ"כ הַהֶכְרֵחִי לָאָדָם לַעֲשׂוֹת וְלִגְמוֹר הַמִּצְוָה בְּמַעֲשֶׂה, כִּי זֶה בִּלְתִּי אֶפְשָׁרִי לְאָדָם שֶׁיַּעֲמוֹד עַל כַּוָּונָתוֹ בְּבֵירוּר שֶׁיְּהֵא בְּכַוָּונָה שְׁלֵימָה בְּרָצוֹן מָלֵא, גַּם אִם יְדַמֶּה לוֹ לְאָדָם שֶׁכַּוָּונָתוֹ כַּוָּונָה שְׁלֵימָה לַעֲשׂוֹת הַמִּצְוָה לִשְׁמוֹ יִתְבָּרֵךְ, לֹא יַאֲמִין לְעַצְמוֹ עַד שֶׁיִּגְמוֹר הַמִּצְוָה, כִּי כֵן טֶבַע חוֹמֶר גּוּף הָאָדָם לְמָנְעוֹ מִלַּחְשׁוֹב מַחֲשָׁבוֹת בְּרָצוֹן מָלֵא וְשָׁלֵם.
  1. Rashi on Vayikra 1:9 explains nicho'ach, “pleasing,” as “satisfaction before Me, that I spoke and My will was done.” ↩
  2. Berachos 15a; Megillah 20a, said by R' Meir of the reading of Shema. ↩
In shortHashem wants above all a whole desire to do His will, so whole intent counts at once; yet a person must still finish the deed, for he cannot trust his own intent.
32Indeed, Chazal said: “If a person thought to do a mitzvah and was prevented by circumstances and did not do it, Scripture credits him as though he had done it.”3 The reason is the one we have given: what counts is the intent of the heart. The Creator, blessed be He, Who tests hearts and probes the innermost parts, knows this person's thoughts, that his intent was for His Name with a whole desire, and so He counts it as though he had done it. With a king of flesh and blood it is different. When he wants to test his servants, he commands them some task to see whether they will do it wholly; but he cannot test their hearts, whether their intent to serve him is whole, true and willing. Only after they have done and carried out the service he commanded can he look at the deed they did and test their intent a little. But the Creator, may He be exalted, Who searches all the chambers of the inner being and tests the heart and the innermost parts, knows what a person truly intends, and if it is whole, it counts as done. The reverse holds too: if a person does a mitzvah in deed but does not set his heart to do it in fear and love, “it does not fly upward.”4
וּבֶאֱמֶת אָמְרוּ חז"ל "חִשֵּׁב לַעֲשׂוֹת מִצְוָה וְנֶאֱנַס וְלֹא עֲשָׂאָהּ מַעֲלֶה עָלָיו הַכָּתוּב כְּאִילּוּ עֲשָׂאָהּ", וְהַטַּעַם הוּא כִּדְבָרֵינוּ הנ"ל, שֶׁעִיקָּר הוּא כַּוָּונַת הַלֵּב, וְהַבּוֹרֵא ב"ה הַבּוֹחֵן לְבָבוֹת וְחוֹקֵר כְּלָיוֹת יוֹדֵעַ מַחֲשָׁבוֹת זֶה הָאָדָם שֶׁהָיָה כַּוָּונָתוֹ לִשְׁמוֹ בְּרָצוֹן שָׁלֵם, לָכֵן חוֹשֵׁב לוֹ כְּאִילּוּ עֲשָׂאָהּ. בִּשְׁלָמָא מֶלֶךְ בָּשָׂר וָדָם הָרוֹצֶה לִבְחוֹן אֶת עֲבָדָיו וּמְצַוֶּה לָהֶם אֵיזֶה עֲבוֹדָה לַעֲשׂוֹת אִם יַעֲשֶׂה בִּשְׁלֵימוּת, לֹא יִבְחוֹן אֶת לְבָבָם אִם כַּוָּונָתָם שְׁלֵימָה לְעָבְדוֹ בֶּאֱמֶת וּבְרָצוֹן, רַק אַחַר שֶׁיַּעֲשׂוּ וִיקַיְּימוּ אֶת מִצְוַת עֲבוֹדָתוֹ אֲשֶׁר צִוָּה עֲלֵיהֶם, יֵרָאֶה לְפִי הַמַּעֲשֶׂה אֲשֶׁר עָשׂוּ וְיִבְחוֹן קְצָת כַּוָּונָתָם, אֲבָל הַבּוֹרֵא יִתְעַלֶּה, הַחוֹפֵשׂ כָּל חַדְרֵי בֶּטֶן וּבוֹחֵן כְּלָיוֹת וָלֵב, יוֹדֵעַ תּוֹכֶן כַּוָּונָתוֹ, אִם הִיא שְׁלֵימָה אֲזַי חָשׁוּב לְפָנָיו יִתְבָּרֵךְ כְּאִילּוּ עֲשָׂאָהּ, וְכֵן לְהֵיפֶךְ, אִם יַעֲשֶׂה אָדָם מִצְוָה בְּמַעֲשֶׂה וְלֹא יְכַוֵּין לִבּוֹ לַעֲשׂוֹת בִּדְחִילוּ וּרְחִימוּ, לָא פָּרְחַת לְעֵילָּא.
  1. Berachos 6a; Kiddushin 40a; Shabbos 63a. ↩
  2. Tikkunei Zohar 25b, said there of Torah: “Torah without fear and love does not fly upward.” ↩
In shortHashem, Who sees the heart, counts a whole intent as the deed itself, unlike a human king who must judge by deeds; a deed without fear and love does not rise.
33aIt is the way of people that when it comes into their minds to do some mitzvah, the thought begins with great desire, each according to his level. When the thought and will of a complete tzaddik rise to do a mitzvah, his desire and warm longing are as great as his righteousness, and the flame of Hashem's fire burns in him to do the mitzvah in complete wholeness. This was Avraham Avinu's intent when Hashem said to him, “Take your son … and bring him up as a burnt offering”:5 his heart began to burn like a coal of fire and a flame. But when a person delays and is held back, tarrying before he does the mitzvah and completes it in deed, he falls from the great longing he had at first, when the thought arose in him. Avraham feared just this: that in the delay of a three-day journey he would fall from the great longing burning in his heart. So at once “he split the wood for the burnt offering,”6 so that the deed too would be done at once, in this same great flame. This answers why he split the wood at home and did not wait for the place itself.
וְהִנֵּה מִדֶּרֶךְ בְּנֵי אָדָם כְּשֶׁיַּעֲלֶה עַל מַחְשַׁבְתָּם לַעֲשׂוֹת אֵיזֶה מִצְוָה, אֲזַי תְּחִילַּת הַמַּחֲשָׁבָה הוּא בְּחֵשֶׁק גָּדוֹל כָּל אֶחָד לְפִי מַדְרֵיגָתוֹ, וְהַצַּדִּיק גָּמוּר אֲשֶׁר יַעֲלֶה מַחְשַׁבְתּוֹ וּרְצוֹנוֹ לַעֲשׂוֹת מִצְוָה, הוּא ג"כ לְפִי גּוֹדֶל צִדְקָתוֹ כֵּן גּוֹדֶל חִשְׁקוֹ וְהִשְׁתּוֹקְקוּתוֹ בַּחֲמִימוּת, וְהִתְלַהֲבוּת אֵשׁ ה' תִּבְעַר בּוֹ לַעֲשׂוֹת הַמִּצְוָה בְּתוֹכָן הַשְּׁלֵימוּת. וְזֶה הָיָה כַּוָּונַת אַבְרָהָם אָבִינוּ ע"ה כַּאֲשֶׁר אָמַר לוֹ השי"ת "קַח אֶת בִּנְךָ כּוּ' וְהַעֲלֵהוּ לְעוֹלָה", הָיָה מַתְחִיל לִבּוֹ לִבְעוֹר כְּגַחֶלֶת אֵשׁ וְשַׁלְהֶבֶת, אַךְ אַחַר הַמְשָׁכָה וְעַכָּבָה שֶׁיִּתְמַהְמַהּ הָאָדָם לַעֲשׂוֹת הַמִּצְוָה וּלְגוֹמְרָהּ בְּמַעֲשֶׂה, נוֹפֵל הָאָדָם מִתְּשׁוּקָתוֹ הַגְּדוֹלָה שֶׁהָיָה לוֹ מִתְּחִילָּה בַּעֲלוֹתוֹ עַל מַחְשַׁבְתּוֹ, וּמִזֶּה הָיָה מִתְיָרֵא אַבְרָהָם שֶׁיִּפּוֹל מִתְּשׁוּקָתוֹ הַגְּדוֹלָה הַזֹּאת הַבּוֹעֵר בְּלִבּוֹ בְּהִתְמַהְמַהּ בַּדֶּרֶךְ שְׁלֹשָׁה יָמִים, לָכֵן מִיָּד "וַיְבַקַּע עֲצֵי עוֹלָה", כְּדֵי שֶׁיִּהְיֶה הַמַּעֲשֶׂה מִיָּד ג"כ בְּשַׁלְהֶבֶת הַגָּדוֹל הַזֶּה,
  1. Bereishis 22:2. ↩
  2. Bereishis 22:3, before they set out. ↩
In shortA tzaddik's longing to do a mitzvah burns hottest at first and cools with delay, so Avraham split the wood at once, to act while the flame still burned.
33bThis is also what Yitzchak meant when he said “the fire,” with the definite article. He was saying: I saw that you had this great fire, the one known in the way of tzaddikim. And the proof that the fire of Hashem burned in you is “the wood”: when you split the wood at once, I saw that you meant to do the deed at once, as though the burnt offering were ready before you to offer that moment. That is why he said “the wood” as well. “But where is the lamb for the burnt offering?” That is: why take me as the offering? A lamb would have been enough. This answers why he named the lamb and did not say simply, “Where is the burnt offering?” Avraham answered him, “God will see for Himself the lamb for the burnt offering, my son”: the lamb will appear then, when you too do a great deed and become the offering yourself.
וְזֶהוּ ג"כ שֶׁאָמַר לוֹ יִצְחָק "הִנֵּה הָאֵשׁ" בה"א הַיְּדִיעָה, כְּלוֹמַר מֵאַחַר שֶׁרָאִיתִי שֶׁהָיָה לְךָ הָאֵשׁ הַגָּדוֹל הַזֶּה הַיָּדוּעַ כְּדֶרֶךְ הַצַּדִּיקִים, וְהָרְאָיָה שֶׁאֵשׁ ה' בָּעַר בְּךָ, דְּהִנֵּה "וְהָעֵצִים", דַּאֲנִי רָאִיתִי בִּבְקִיעַת הָעֵצִים שֶׁבִּקַּעְתָּ מִיָּד לְכַוָּונָה זֹאת שֶׁתַּעֲשֶׂה מַעֲשֶׂה מִיָּד כְּאִילּוּ נָכוֹן לְפָנֶיךָ לְהַעֲלוֹת עוֹלָה מִיָּד, וְזֶהוּ 'וְהָעֵצִים' בה"א הַיְּדִיעָה, "וְאַיֵּה הַשֶּׂה לְעוֹלָה", ר"ל לָמָּה לְךָ לָקַחַת אוֹתִי לְעוֹלָה, דַּי הָיָה בְּשֶׂה, "וַיֹּאמֶר לוֹ אַבְרָהָם אֱלֹהִים יִרְאֶה לּוֹ הַשֶּׂה לְעוֹלָה בְּנִי", ר"ל אָז יִרְאֶה הַשֶּׂה, כַּאֲשֶׁר תַּעֲשֶׂה גַּם אַתָּה מַעֲשֶׂה רַב שֶׁתִּהְיֶה לְעוֹלָה.
In short“The fire” was the known fire of tzaddikim burning in Avraham, “the wood” its proof, split at once; the lamb would appear only when Yitzchak, too, became the offering.
The maamar as a whole

R’ Elimelech begins with what Hashem wants from a mitzvah: a full and whole desire to do His will. So a whole intent counts at once as the deed, as Chazal said of one who meant to do a mitzvah and was prevented; yet a person must still finish the deed, for he cannot trust that his intent is whole. A tzaddik’s longing burns hottest when the thought first rises and cools with delay. Avraham, fearing three days of travel would cool his flame, split the wood at once, so that the deed too would be done in that fire. Yitzchak saw it: “the fire,” the known fire of tzaddikim, and “the wood,” its proof. A lamb would have been enough, he said; Avraham answered that the lamb would appear when Yitzchak too became the offering.

Takeaway

The first warmth we feel for a mitzvah is precious, and delay is what cools it. When the desire to do good rises in us, we can act on it at once, as Avraham split the wood before he set out, so that the deed is done in the same fire as the thought.

The daily tzaddik · freeA tzaddik, a torah and a story, every morning.A short email with the day's yahrzeit, his torah and a story. Never on Shabbos or Yom Tov. Unsubscribe in one click.

Learn this in the merit of Rebbe Elimelech of Lizhensk. His yahrzeit and life ›

All of Noam Elimelech

More on Parshas Vayera

See all ›

English translation, notes and summaries © Zechusam.